Showing posts with label technobureaucracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label technobureaucracy. Show all posts

Thursday, May 13, 2021

The Managerial Revolution

Saturday, March 27, 2021

Managerialism

Thursday, February 04, 2021

Wednesday, December 23, 2020

Ed Welsch on James Burnham

Thursday, December 03, 2020

Interview with Dr. Mike Yeadon on December 14

Who's Going to Take Vermeule's Position?

And say yes?

Wednesday, December 02, 2020

Using Problems to Consolidate Power



















Mike Whitney

Monday, November 23, 2020

Charles Hugh Smith on the Great Reset







Another NGO working in league with the WEF?


This one definitely is.


Saturday, November 21, 2020

The Deep State

Friday, November 13, 2020

True Leadership?

Doubtful. More like a counterfeit that is akin to being a presumptuous functionary.



Related:


Bottum-Up Revolution Podcast

Saturday, November 07, 2020

Technobureaucracy as a Tool of the State and the Oligarchy



The New Atlantic

Sunday, November 01, 2020

A Defense of the Administrative State



Sunstein and Vermeule

Monday, October 26, 2020

Liberals Uphold the Technobureaucratic State. Who Knew?



This Is not Actually Democracy

Thursday, October 08, 2020

Competent Government = Effective State Bureacracy

Whatever this is, this is not republicanism.

Wednesday, September 16, 2020

A Review of Law and Leviathan



Related:

Monday, September 14, 2020

Law and Leviathan



Friday, August 28, 2020

Claiming the Center

Sunday, August 16, 2020

Won't Disagree with This Headline



First Things

Patrick Deneen reviews The New Class War: Saving Democracy from the Managerial Elite by Michael Lind.

Deneen:
Not unlike the managerial elite he criticizes, Lind fails to draw the correct conclusion from his own analysis. What’s ­needed is not “democratic pluralism” in which the ruling class remains a neoliberal, managerial elite who strategically concede some wealth and status to their inferiors. What’s needed is a fundamental displacement of the elite ethos by a common-good, popular conservatism that directs both economic goals and social values toward broadly shared material and social capital, toward the support of family and community life. We do not need libertarian overlords who buy off the working class with some welfare, nor a federal government that doles out tax receipts to localities, nor secularists who grudgingly grant some space to religious believers, but a ruling class that is itself informed by the very values that Lind believes were once regnant as the price of admission to elite status itself. Only the fear of not conforming to the regnant ethos will sufficiently move elites, but that fear will arise subsequent to the wholesale defeat, displacement, and discrediting of the regnant elite ethos.

This means, contra Lind, that what is needed is not “democratic pluralism,” which Lind envisions as a balance of power between an otherwise exploitative ruling class and an electorally powerful underclass. Rather, the current ruling class needs to be displaced by the ethos of the underclass: people shaped by and supportive of guild, ward, and congregation. The ruling class, no less than the working class, should be shaped by commitments of solidarity and subsidiarity, and not merely accord grudgingly with those who are. Lind regards the revival of such institutions as the Church as an unrealistic goal and calls for some sort of functional equivalent. Yet the decline of organizational forms of unions, local politics, and Church has been significantly advanced by the ­individualist, materialist, and secular ethos embraced by today’s managerial elite. If these institutions declined due to sustained efforts by the managerial elite, their renewal can be effected through the displacement of that elite with a different one informed by an opposing ethos. The power sought is not merely to balance the current elite, but to replace them. In the end, there is no “functional equivalent” of solidarity and subsidiarity, and only a leadership and working class steeped in such values will restore the ­republic.

This is the conservative fantasy, that they will gain power -- the "illiberals" or common-good conservatives will enact common-good conservatism when they get power, after enlisting the support of the working class. Tell me, who is going to provide the financial support to make this happen? Donald Trump? How are they going to overcome the gatekeepers within the Republican Party who act on behalf of the oligarchy?

Friday, May 29, 2020

Who's Going to Control It? Not You or Other Latin Integralists.

Fantastical.

Friday, May 08, 2020

More of Vermeule's Brand of Constitutionalism

MOJ: Deference and the Common Good By Adrian Vermeule