This was posted over at
Vox Nova:
"The natural law itself, no less than devotion to humanity, urges that ways of migration be opened to these people. For the Creator of the universe made all good things primarily for the good of all. Since land everywhere offers the possibility of supporting a large number of people, the sovereignty of the State, although it must be respected, cannot be exaggerated to the point that access to this land is, for inadequate or unjustified reasons, denied to needy and decent people from other nations, provided of course, that the public wealth, considered very carefully, does not forbid this."
It is taken from Pius XII's
Exsul Familiar Nazarethana.
Text of the apostolic constitution. Unfortunately it is not available at the Vatican
website, particularly the Latin. I'd like to see what the original terms for "public wealth" are.
Not surprisingly, citation of this document and of others is emphasized over at the blog
Evangelical Catholicism.
This is possibly an example of "dogmatic proof-texting," though how this is to be applied to the current political discussion on illegal immigration is left unstated in the original post. But I would argue that it does not have any direct bearing on the current debate about illegal immigration, since the passage does not touch upon integration into an already existing political community--merely the right to migrate.
Some things to consider:1) Land or space -- the free migration of peoples and their resettlement if their survival necessitates it. This is not the same as the right to be integrated or to join an already existing political community.
Land, just like all natural resources, is a common good, for the benefit of all mankind, though how it is allotted for the use of individuals and communities is left to the determination of human law.
2) The potential destruction of culture; differences between the migration of a hunter-gatherer group, and members of an agrarian or industrial society. Hunter-gatherer groups usually migrate as a group--they bring their political community with them. Members of an agrarian or industrial society migrate as individuals or as families.
The migration of peoples versus the migration of individuals (or of families.)
3) How much of land is arable? Is the integration of immigrants more readily achieved in an agrarian economy or in an 'industrial' economy?
The United States does not have a sustainable political economy, and it is not merely an empire in the sense of imposing its will on the rest of the world, but an empire as a political entity aspiring to a centralized government, one that is not adequate to address the needs of different parts and yet holds onto the illusion that it can, preventing any competitors from having real political and economic power.
Hence, there is a tension between meeting the needs of citizens who are poor and helping immigrants, both illegal and legal. One should first be concerned with a establishing a just political economy that will aid poor citizens, and then determining what is possible once this is done. It may be that instituting a sustainable economic system will diminish what supposed wealth the nation may have, and thus a different course of action with respect to immigrants needs to be found, rather than making them beneficiaries of the welfare state.
4. While a community may help illegal immigrants out of benevolence, the beneficiaries should not act unjustly or take advantage of the community's hospitality. If they are prevented from becoming a citizen, nonetheless they should strive to become a member of the community, seeking integration and becoming familiar with the customs and mores of that community, and adopting them, in so far as they are in accordance with the Divine Law.
A community has a legitimate concern with the immigration of people who have customs at variance with its own, and whose practice of those customs threaten to undermine the moral fabric of that community. This is one basis for the restriction of immigration; other considerations include natural limits--the size of the community, availability of resources, and so on.
On a related note:How long should one stay in a godless community that violates God's laws more and more? How long should Lot wait before he flees Sodom? Obviously finding an answer takes prayer and careful discernment.
check