Still pedestalizing women (that is themselves, in some case)...
Fifty Shades of Grey = Fifty Shades of Desperation by Teresa Tomeo (via Insight Scoop)
"In fact, in the movie trailer, Anastasia is shown strapped to a bed with satisfied look on her face as if this is normal bedroom behavior. Deep down what we really desire is healthy male leadership. But because many women rejected our natural design, today’s thoroughly modern woman, as sophisticated as she thinks she is, has really no idea who she is at all. As a result we’re settling for the most unnatural and perverted substitutes."
Leadership defined in what terms, though? As for what women "really" desire - women who have been trained to understand themselves and act accordingly and virtuously, perhaps. But women who accept feminism and want to be like men in every other aspect of life? And finally, is it possible that the example of Anastasia is just female sexual desire taken to another degree? Unless you want to argue that that sort of consensual bedroom behavior, aside from the fornication, is intrinsically immoral? Too sensual or tied to the gratification of animal (~base) desires? That is, any exhibition of male domination and female submission other than [invitation,] initiation, consent and missionary position is counter to reason?
Right before this she writes:
"Somewhere along the way we lost ourselves in the process and this is where we ended up: believing that agreeing to be a man’s “submissive” and hanging out in a red room of pain can equate happiness and fulfillment."
The perversion begins not with the sex but with the female desire for authority and to be like a man. As contributors to the androsphere points out, the extremes in sexual behavior is a (unconscious) reaction against this that cannot but be exaggerated because of how she conducts herself otherwise in daily life.
No comments:
Post a Comment