Showing posts with label moral theology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label moral theology. Show all posts

Friday, August 06, 2021

Lord Have Mercy










Sunday, July 18, 2021

Find Your Tribe

if you want to find your life's mission, not this nonsense generated by a female academic living an atomized life.

Wednesday, July 14, 2021

But the Usurers Are in Control

Monday, February 22, 2021

No Thanks

Friday, February 05, 2021

Apologists for Sherman (and Lincoln)?

Monday, December 21, 2020

Latin Progs Love It When the Shoe is on the Other Foot





Related:





Wednesday, October 28, 2020

Sad





Did they study Ratzinger and the CDF for moral theology at the seminary?

Fr. Raymond J. de Souza on Fratelli Tutti on War

Sunday, October 18, 2020

This Is Like a Facile Reading of the Parable of the Good Samaritan



Possibly bad exegesis as a means of proof-texting for moral theology. The exercise of "political authority" can be good; but there is also such a thing as illegitimate political authority, or tyranny.

Saturday, October 17, 2020

Pope Francis on War



Modern warfare is a problem because of scale. The scale problem initiates in the state; the state is the problem that needs to be fixed.

Monday, September 21, 2020

Some Might Interpret This as Advising Absolute Pacifism

But the context is not provided, and he is not present on earth to clarify. It is the case that one cannot wage war on evil directly nor eradicate directly, as one cannot coerce the will. One can only prevent another from committing grave evil or harm. But this charitable reading of the saint's words is probably not what he meant.

Friday, September 11, 2020

A Bit Pharasaical?



The former is easier to accomplish than the latter, and what power do consumers have over Big Pharma? How much application of pressure is enough to assuage their consciences?

Thursday, August 06, 2020

The Morality of the Atomic Bombings

Wednesday, July 08, 2020

The First Principles of Practical Reason

Public Discourse: On the First Principles of Moral Reasonby Paul R. DeHart




Sunday, May 17, 2020

Probably Won't Be Like Rules for Retrogrades



Maybe I'll get a copy of Rules for Retrogrades when TAN has a big sale. I suspect that it isn't close to what is advocated by those in the alt-r.

Is a Christian obligated always to use dialectic when engaging in those who are enemies of his community? I think it can be argued that a Christian can use rhetoric to discredit the enemies of his community in order to protect his community and to persuade the uncommitted, but such an action may not be reckoned as "nice" behavior. Shaming them , e.g. calling them easily triggered snowflakes may not be an effective tactic all the time, as some may not care. Shaming tactics can and should be morally used with one's own community; with those who are outside the community it is less of a shaming action than an insult but an insult that may be truth-telling.

Just resistance in political arrangement such as ours is something that Latin moral theology has not really considered, and may never consider before the collapse of Catholic higher education is complete. Responding to attacks by SJWs may necessarily include communication, but communication is only one response of many.



Ultramontanist When It's Your Guy Who's Pope

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

What Is the Solution?

The standard Roman Catholic wedding vows do not include a promise for the wife to obey the husband:

Couples wedding in the Roman Catholic Church essentially make the same pledge to one another. According to the Rite of Marriage (#25) the customary text in English is:[4]
I, ____, take you, ____, to be my (husband/wife). I promise to be true to you in good times and in bad, in sickness and in health. I will love you and honour you all the days of my life.
In the United States, Catholic wedding vows may also take the following form:[4]
I, ____, take you, ____, to be my lawfully wedded(husband/wife), to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, until death do us part.
The priest will then say aloud "You have declared your consent before the Church. May the Lord in his goodness strengthen your consent and fill you both with his blessings. What God has joined, men must not divide. Amen."[5]

Saturday, March 28, 2020

Very Sloppy

This doesn't even rise to the level of moral theologizing, as there is no attempt to analyze the proof text for the relevant principles and a determination of their application to the current situation.

Rorate Caeli: Leo XIII -"Man Precedes the State": A State that Destroys Jobs is Destroying the Primary Instinct of Man -- Self-Preservation

Wednesday, March 18, 2020

Dorothy Day: An Introduction to Her Life and Thought

Ignatius Press: Dorothy Day: An Introduction to Her Life and Thought by Terrence C. Wright

CWR: The radical and orthodox faith of Dorothy Day

Terrence Wright’s recent book demonstrates that Day was a radical in her political and social views because she was first a truly radical Catholic in her appropriation of the deepest currents in the Church’s ancient Tradition.