The full McCarrick report is now online and public:https://t.co/gwpHjH7RKt
— Cindy Wooden (@Cindy_Wooden) November 10, 2020
The #McCarrickReport: Full Text and A Vatican Summary | National Catholic Register https://t.co/WF5kvpnWac @NCRegister
— Edward Pentin (@EdwardPentin) November 10, 2020
#BREAKING Vatican releases report on disgraced former Cardinal and sexual predator Theodore #McCarrick.
— Bree A Dail (@breeadail) November 10, 2020
No press conference accompanied this document release, no statement from the #Vatican was made.https://t.co/yTCSHOMEX1 pic.twitter.com/Ztk93jJzQK
By the early 1980s, one New York mother knew she had to speak up about Theodore McCarrick and her sons. #McCarrickReport https://t.co/O0qvJy73Oy
— Catholic News Agency (@cnalive) November 10, 2020
The #McCarrickReport includes a letter written by a U.S. cardinal in 1999 objecting to McCarrick’s appointment to a higher office because of allegations of misconduct, including at a New Jersey beach house. https://t.co/fUwap1h0Xc
— Catholic News Agency (@cnalive) November 10, 2020
Statement on Holy See’s Report on Theodore McCarrick Most Reverend José H. Gomez Archbishop of Los Angeles President, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops: https://t.co/HzuFRE7O8l pic.twitter.com/jhq66P729i
— U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (@USCCB) November 10, 2020
The #McCarrickReport is a sad whitewash. Contrary to this headline, blaming JPII, the report says "3 of the 4" New Jersey bishops" provided John Paul “with inaccurate and incomplete in information…regarding McCarrick’s sexual conduct with young adults.” 1/2 https://t.co/kGAuKUh32F
— Raymond Arroyo (@RaymondArroyo) November 10, 2020
It remains unknown how much Pope Francis knew about McCarrick in the five years between Francis’ election as pope and his removing the former cardinal from ministry, @ColleenDulle writes.https://t.co/QMfscDikFN
— America Magazine (@americamag) November 9, 2020
“In the case of #McCarrick, the simple fact is that pathological personalities lie and deceive people - even intelligent and saintly people - and that’s what McCarrick was able to do," said George Weigel. https://t.co/awhGiqwdR2
— Catholic News Agency (@cnalive) November 10, 2020
The Vatican report recognizes the history of Theodore McCarrick as a serious injury to the Catholic Church. But it does not address the crucial question of influence: the influence that McCarrick wielded, and the influence that promoted him. https://t.co/P0fMtSkqee
— Philip Lawler (@PhilLawler) November 10, 2020
My instant reaction to the #McCarrickReport: its chief purpose is to obscure the shameful role played by Pope Francis, who rehabilitated McCarrick and his cronies because they were useful to him, and acted only when the media forced him to. https://t.co/DH24ojFfDJ
— Damian Thompson (@holysmoke) November 10, 2020
This tells us so much about the politics of today’s @USCCB https://t.co/4WW3NGjwkv
— Damian Thompson (@holysmoke) November 10, 2020
First glance, the McCarrick report is a very sobering, astringent read that doesn’t hide any uncomfortable truths. It just lets the chips fall where they ....... BLAHAHAHA Nope. All blame shifted to nobodies or the deceased.
— Michael Brendan Dougherty (@michaelbd) November 10, 2020
Vatican’s McCarrick Report reveals crucial gaps in Archbishop Vigano’s ‘testimony’ https://t.co/C3QwmHFuer
— America Magazine (@americamag) November 10, 2020
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò issues initial response to the #McCarrickReport: pic.twitter.com/6yauaD5uGL
— Diane Montagna (@dianemontagna) November 10, 2020
It's truly astonishing that Francis still imagines that anyone takes him seriously. Thank God for Viganò and, quite frankly, to hell with the Vatican spin machine! https://t.co/ffWtjth1Pf
— Michael J. Matt (@Michael_J_Matt) November 10, 2020
No comments:
Post a Comment