Showing posts with label bishops. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bishops. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 08, 2020

It Needs to Be Asked

Did the bishop have a father figure when he was growing up?

Saturday, September 05, 2020

Bishop Strickland on World Over

Thursday, September 03, 2020

Someone Was Dumb about the CCP

Wednesday, June 03, 2020

"Catholic Left" and "Catholic Right"

Are there two political factions here? Are those political differences significant enough that there is a valid difference in political identity? The Catholic Left and the Catholic Right are not readily identifiable with Democratic voters and Republican voters, and even a division between anti-Trump and pro-Trump is questionable, though those on the "Catholic Left" are perhaps more likely to be anti-Trump than the "Catholic Right" are pro-Trump, as many of the prominent members of the "Catholic Right" are critical of Trump when they think it is appropriate. Did he speak with his brother bishop Wilton Gregory?

Maybe the bishop should explain what he means by the Catholic Left and the Catholic Right so we can determine whether he is lumping people under a label or not.

As for the Church avoiding being suckered into a secular, political agenda -- maybe the bishops should avoid politicizing themselves, but that's not a requirement of the laity. The problem is not the laity voicing their opinion, the problem is that bishops don't know what their appropriate role is (and canon law is wrong on this point). Before they say anything further, they should try to live in an actual community.

Monday, April 20, 2020

Do We Have Accountability Between Bishops and Theologians?

I will someday have to look through Ivan Illich's corpus of writings on power disparity as applied to the institutional Church.

Most of what is put forth in the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church (a Latin document, which I can't repeat enough) is not divinely revealed precepts (either through Tradition or the Natural Law), but moral theology, as the Compendium itself admits. No bishop becomes automatically competent in moral theology simply by being consecrated a bishop; and whatever authority he possesses in that field will depend on the state of his knowledge of moral theology and the soundness of his reasoning, not his possession of Holy Orders. Just because he is a bishop doesn't mean that his moral theological opinions are sound or that they have authoritative weight by virtue of his being a bishop. What would have authoritative weight is his presentation of divinely revealed precepts or commandments, and even this must be tested as it is not an innate form of knowledge but handed from one generation to the next. Any "new" precepts must be established or demonstrated from precepts that are known, and this is the task of moral theology -- there is no new "Divine Revelation" as such, though this may be considered a legitimate development of doctrine.


Thursday, April 02, 2020

Never Gonna Happen

CNA/CWR: China owes ‘apology and compensation’ for coronavirus, says cardinal

Related:


Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Bishop's Panel: Shepherding the Flock in Times of Crisis

The Most Reverend Thomas John Paprocki, Bishop of Springfield, Illinois
The Most Reverend Joseph Edward Strickland, Bishop of Tyler, Texas
The Most Reverend Thomas Anthony Daly, Bishop of Spokane, Washington
The Most Reverend Charles Chaput, Archbishop of Philadelphia

Saturday, May 11, 2019

Does Cardinal Ouellet Have Any Credibility Left?





Edit.
CWR: What’s (not) in Pope Francis’s new accountability measures by Christopher R. Altieri

We spent most of Thursday learning what is in the new law, Vos estis lux mundi, after Pope Francis presented it to the public ahead of June 1st, the date on which is slated to [...]

Friday, January 25, 2019

If He Can't Do His Job, He Should Resign

Crisis: Disgraced Cardinal Must Not Address Catholic Conference BY AUSTIN RUSE
What message is being sent to victims of priest sex abuse that Cardinal Roger Mahony will be a featured speaker at the upcoming Los Angeles Archdiocesan Education Conference, the largest [...]

Instead of lecturing about immigration and trying to redefine American identity, Archbishop Jose H. Gomez needs to do his job and clean house, including replacing the staff for LA Religious Congress or cancelling it, if necessary. There is absolutely no doubt that Roger Mahony, who should be laicized and punished with other penalties, should not be allowed to speak at the congress.

Bishop of Covington Apologizes

And in the process makes himself look even worse. "Bullied"? Unbelievable.

Yes, the principal should resign. (Even if he does issue an apology letter, and I don't think he has.) The bishop should resign too, but bishops apparently don't have to live up to a code of honor.

LifeSite: BREAKING: Covington bishop apologizes to pro-life students: ‘we…allowed ourselves to be bullied’
Covington bishop apologizes to Covington Catholic students

Wednesday, January 02, 2019

Is Ouellet Part of the Problem?

Or is the problem a Latin conception of the Church being above the authority of the state with regards to even civil matters and civil cases? If the Church hierarchy won't agree to the state policing it, then will it allow lay people to do so? How can the hierarchy be made accountable? (Appealing to the pope as the chief ruler of the Church is not the solution.)

CNA: Ouellet letter: US bishops’ vote on abuse reform measures was blocked to allow more discussion