Showing posts with label secession. Show all posts
Showing posts with label secession. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 15, 2021

TEXIT

Tuesday, May 25, 2021

Separation Now



Michael Anton is naive if he thinks this will be accomplished without conflict.

Friday, January 29, 2021

Separation Now




Wayne Allensworth: Died of a Theory: What Happened to the Old America?

Thursday, January 14, 2021

A Review of Kreitner's Break It Up

written by a woman...

Monday, January 11, 2021

Good for Saying One Thing in Retirement



Lew Rockwell goes further and advocates secession:

Wednesday, December 23, 2020

Secession is the only Peaceful Solution Remaining





G&G up, and go train.


Thursday, November 05, 2020

We Don't Want Unity

Separation now. Dreher can't even admit what else has been lost, thanks to Hart-Celler and weaponized migration:
"We are a divided country because we have lost the core narratives that bound us: a shared Christian faith (however attenuated), and a shared commitment to the historical narrative of America as an imperfect country that always strives to make life better for the next generation than the one that came before it.



At least the paleolibertarians are good for something: What Will It Take for Americans to Consider Breaking Up? by Jeff Deist

Monday, November 02, 2020

An Accurate Map?



Saturday, October 24, 2020

Bill Kauffman on Secession

Salvaging Secession
The Founders understood union as a strategic necessity, not a moral imperative.

Friday, October 16, 2020

Donald Livingston Reviews American Secession



Chronicles

Monday, September 28, 2020

FH Buckley is Useful for Something



Modern Age

Wednesday, September 23, 2020

A Good Ideal, But Practicable?



Unherd

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

An Example of Leadership from the Ivory Tower



American Mind

Finally, at the intellectual level, those who are committed to the Electoral College, a federal republic, and checks and balances must make the case for them, and those who want to see the United States remain united need to dust off their Federalist and their Lincoln and begin making the constitutional and political case for unity and against secession.

And if that is not enough? Would the author be content for others to do the dirty work of using force to maintain the union? Academics.Clown face

Monday, July 06, 2020

Sunday, May 10, 2020

And Of Our Right to Not Associate?

The First Amendment is not enough, nor is the original assumption that states should be sovereign.

TAC Bookshelf: TAC Bookshelf: Defending Our Constitutional Right to Associate
Bradley J. Birzer, TAC fellow-at-large: Our fundamental right to associate with whom we please—in our families, in our churches, in our schools, in our businesses, and in our fraternal orders—is under assault. That’s the argument made by Luke C. Sheahan in his excellent new book, Why Associations Matter: The Case for First Amendment Pluralism (University Press of Kansas, 2020).
The courts have progressively diminished just the idea of associating, even though they once espoused the “right to petition” and the “right to assemble” in the First Amendment as essential to a proper understanding of the Constitution. Sadly, recent court decisions have looked at the right to assemble merely as connected to free speech, thus only allowing association when the goal is to express some idea. Drawing on, fascinatingly, 19th-century political thought, as well as the work of Robert Nisbet, Sheahan properly re-orients the discussion in the present day, asking all the right questions and finding rather brilliant solutions. Why Associations Matter is a must-read and a must-own. If we lose the right to associate—beyond just expression—we lose our profound American identity.

University Press of Kansas: Why Associations Matter: The Case for First Amendment Pluralism
University Press of Kansas Blog: Luke C. Sheahan discusses “Why Associations Matter; The Case for First Amendment Pluralism”

Related:



Friday, January 24, 2020

Sunday, May 05, 2019