Dr. Fleming's comment in the latest entry in his paleocon series: "On the other hand, their own distributist/Third Way arguments are far closer to Marxism than to the Gospels or to Leo XIII."
I think he would agree that the right to property is not absolute and that there should be a wide distribution of property in order to safeguard economic and political liberty in a republic? So with what part of distributism would he disagree? The proposition that the government can foster the redistribution of resources (such as land), indirectly or indierctly? Or the proposition that the government can redistribute wealth in general? I wonder what the arguments of the two gentlemen were.
Related:
Which Capitalism? A Brief Defense of the Supporters of the Free Economy by Dylan Pahman
No comments:
Post a Comment