Showing posts with label sacred architecture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sacred architecture. Show all posts

Thursday, July 22, 2021

Neo-Gothic Chapel

Thursday, June 24, 2021

Lord Have Mercy

Thursday, February 18, 2021

The Aesthetic Sense



Men and clerics without chests, a form of worship that is counter to logike, and the absence of beauty: all indicative of severe structural and doctrinal problems in Latin Christianity.

Tuesday, December 08, 2020

Change in Design for the New SSPX Church?





Wednesday, November 18, 2020

Holy Cross Monastery Breaks Ground

Saturday, October 31, 2020

St. Thomas Aquinas University Parish



parish website

Catholic Hoos at UVa

NCReg: Bishop of Richmond Dedicates New Church at University of Virginia and University of Virginia is Getting a Church That Looks Like a Church

$10.6 million for a bare church, though the architecture is more traditional than Latin modernist monstrosities. They could have set aside $1 or $2 million for some proper iconography?

Monday, September 21, 2020

This is a Typical Latin Temple



For a Byzantine Christian this would be considered incomplete, given the lack of iconography to cover up those white walls. (The small one in the back is not enough.) There should be iconography covering every surface (if one goes with the Slavic fashion), or at least most of it (in the American Greek fashion, preferably with mosaics, apparently). This looks bare and frankly, not alive but dead. "Cistercian simplicity" and all that, perhaps.

Monday, June 15, 2020

The New Russian Cathedral



Steve Sailer post on the cathedral.





Drone footage

Monday, April 20, 2020

An Explanation for the "Western" Sound?

I have been critical of the sound of Gregorian chant and possibly other forms of Western sacred music. This article at OAJ may explain the reason for the sound of Western sacred music leaning more towards higher voices.



Is the following true of the architectural styles that succeeded the Gothic?
In contrast, Gothic architecture has a distinct acoustic difference. The majority of the wall surface in a large Gothic church is leaded glass. These big expanses of glass are smooth and hard, but they are not unyielding. High-pitched sounds will reflect off them readily, but low-pitched sounds will actually shake them, and this shaking motion absorbs the energy out of the sound. Furthermore, many of the big north-European churches that were famous centers of musicianship had wood, rather than stone, vaulting, and the thin wood ceiling paneling was likewise shakable and absorbent to low pitches. Acoustic measurements show that large Gothic churches have a notable drop off in reverberance in the bass range.

Has this "typical" sound influenced the way schola and choir directors have recruited and organized the voices for their groups, so that this is the sound they wish to mimic or present?

This is significant for the development of western church music. The great composers of the baroque period were mostly employed at huge Gothic churches, and they wrote music tailored to those spaces. The continuous modulation and contrapuntal bass lines in the music of J.S. Bach, for instance, depends upon an acoustic in which the bass decays rapidly. Those bass lines are played on immensely loud organ pipes, and were they to reverberate for several seconds, the music would become muddy and the harmonic modulation would be irritating. The long reverberation in the high frequencies is not a problem, however, because high harmonics are consonant with all notes of a scale. A ringing bell-like descant of high reverberance gives a pleasing sparkle to baroque music without muddying the forward motion.

Would Western chant and singing sound "better" in an Orthodox temple or in the oldest Roman churches, as the lower male voices can be heard more clearly? There are East European temples that are built of wood rather than stone--do these preserve the "Byzantine" sound, and how are they able to do so, in a way that the bass is not preserved in Western temples that have wood? (Is it merely the lack of large [stained-glass] windows?)

It would seem that there should be rules of architecture and building composition so that the bass is preserved, so that there is the presence of masculine voices during the liturgy is emphasized; otherwise there may be consequences on the participation of men during the liturgy, even if they happen at a subconscious level. (And for the West, we should also remember that the actual participation of the majority of the laity in the liturgy was limited as they did not understand Latin.)

Kyrie "In Resurrectione Domini" - Old Roman Chant (Home Edition)




Sunday, August 18, 2019

Eh?

Which Orthdox church gave permission for their building to be used? The Korean Orthodox one in Seoul?

Tuesday, July 03, 2018

St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary in Virignia

Who is the architecture responsible for the final design of the SSPX American seminary? (Cram and Ferguson had been commissioned but the firm resigned from the commission and I can't find any information on who took over subsequently.) It looks very similar to the design for Our Lady of Guadalupe Seminary, as both are Romanesque. Curious that neither order went with a Gothic design -- a more classical look for the United States? How is the St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary assimilating to the locals?





Ordinations:


Video: Inside tour

Related:
website for fundraising
Announcement of the new seminary project

Saturday, June 09, 2018

Friday, January 05, 2018

Monday, March 27, 2017

To Be in a Temple

With the People of God...

Saturday, October 22, 2016

Sacred Architecture: Building for the Senses: A Resurgence of Sacred Architecture in China by Anthony E. Clark and Amanda C. Roth Clark

Wednesday, July 13, 2016