Showing posts with label European history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label European history. Show all posts

Thursday, October 28, 2021

The Battle of Lepanto

Thursday, August 05, 2021

Tom Gallagher's Salazar: The Dictator Who Refused to Die





Salazar: The Dictator Who Refused to Die

Thursday, July 01, 2021

A Pistol Duel in 1896 France

Tuesday, June 08, 2021

Learn from History

Friday, May 14, 2021

Another Legacy of an Imperial Papacy

Thursday, May 13, 2021

Mercenaries in the Ancient World

Sunday, April 11, 2021

The Connection Between Baroque and Folk Music

Thursday, February 25, 2021

What Empire Can Manage a Personal Autocracy?

Is this distinction really that useful?

Saturday, February 20, 2021

"Asceticism"?

Manceaux Dueling Pistols

Friday, February 05, 2021

The Fallacy of Guilt by Association

Facism and bad geneaology.

Wednesday, January 27, 2021

Rise of the West by William McNeill

Thursday, December 10, 2020

The Beginning of Farming in Europe



Table Debates

Wednesday, December 09, 2020

True Friend of the Church?


The challenge was serious, to be clear. The God of the Bible, Sacks contended, was lost in the bargain of Saint Paul’s ambition to spread his newfound faith to the Greco-Roman sphere. More to the point, God was lost in translation. The Greek language, with its left-to-right script, per Sacks, tends toward abstraction and universalization, whereas Hebrew is fundamentally a “right-brained” language, tending toward narrative and particularity. The result was that the West received an abstract, theoretical version of a supremely narrativistic deity.

The Hebrew Bible, Sacks believed, has no “theory” of being itself, of natural law or of political regimes. What it does offer are stories that deal with things like creation, morality, and politics “from multiple perspectives, at a level of subtlety and ambiguity closer to literature” than philosophy. The synthesis—the attempt to Hellenize the Bible and the teachings of Jesus—was an imposition, in Sacks’s view. And it was precisely because the God of the philosophers was so distant and inaccessible, Sacks thought, that the early Church had to posit a God-man as man’s bridge to God.

Sacks was, in truth, a pure anti-metaphysicist. In his 2011 book, The Great Partnership: Science, Religion and the Search for Meaning, he declared: “We cannot prove that life is meaningful and that God exists.” As a philosophy undergraduate at Cambridge, he recounted, he was thrilled by his atheist teachers’ demolition of the classical proofs for God, which he’d always considered a kind of cheap sleight of hand.


Does Western rationalism find its source in medieval scholasticism, after the state had started to rebel against Christendom and the intellectual elites starte do capture that intellectual institution of Christendom, the university? Or is it more a problem of practical atheism spreading thanks to mass culture and the agency of the elites? Blaming St. Paul is really a cheap shot, since St. Paul himself would repeat that the Christian Mystery is the summit of salvation history and God's relationship with His people. And such a Christianity does exist, even if it is obscured by other things, in the Christian East. So how much of an ally was Rabbi Sacks, as opposed to being an advocate of Judaism in what is left of a Christian society?

Tuesday, December 01, 2020

Britons and Anglo-Saxons



Published through Lulu.

Sunday, November 29, 2020

Something on the Roman Empire

Controversial?

Tuesday, November 24, 2020

Rebranding Rule



Yale University Press

Saturday, November 21, 2020

Reminds Me of the Movie Black '47

Trailer for that movie here.

Thursday, November 12, 2020

Matilda: Empress, Queen, Warrior by Catherine Hanley



Yale University Press