What Jefferson taught us https://t.co/gV3CUT4Quy
— Dissident Mama (@Dissident_Mama) December 24, 2020
Wednesday, December 23, 2020
What Jefferson Taught Us
Thursday, October 08, 2020
National Banks
"The incorporation of a bank, and the powers assumed by this bill, have not, in my opinion, been delegated to the United States, by the #Constitution.”
— TenthAmendmentCenter (@TenthAmendment) October 7, 2020
-Thomas Jeffersonhttps://t.co/TPvBRZGJXT
Thursday, September 17, 2020
Progressivism: The Strange History of a Radical Idea
Another nice review of "Progressivism: The Strange History of a Radical Idea," this time in @ModAgeJournal. We were fortunate to have Dr. Watson as our second guest on the show. Have a listen. https://t.co/P3ctTN4Asz https://t.co/EjVBrBSozP
— Ill Literacy: Books with Benson (@IllBooks) September 16, 2020
UND Press
Monday, August 31, 2020
Uh Huh
"It might be appropriate to revise the Haivry/Hazony binary thesis just a bit - starting with Thomas Jefferson." https://t.co/iyNWiw7VwA
— The American Conservative (@amconmag) August 31, 2020
Robert Merry
Friday, June 19, 2020
Jefferson, Madison, and the Making of the Constitution by Jeff Broadwater
Madison confided it was probably better than the Articles of Confederation, but without what he called his favorite proposal—a federal veto over state laws—would fail within a few years. https://t.co/sOdFxgc536
— Law & Liberty (@LawLiberty) June 19, 2020
LL
Thursday, May 21, 2020
What Is Needed for the Development of Republican Virtue
Imaginative Conservative: A Jeffersonian Model of Citizenship by Ralph Ketcham
Wednesday, April 17, 2019
Friday, April 13, 2018
Of all the presidents of the United States, none save Washington and Lincoln have inspired half so much historical writing as Thomas Jefferson. Books and articles by the score have dealt with the Sage of… »
Sunday, October 29, 2017
Two Promising Articles from The Imaginative Conservative
The Revolutionary Conservatism of Jefferson & Small Republics by Arthur J. Versluis
Friday, June 09, 2017
Southron Economics?
Part One: Definitions and Origins Money is a great mystery. In my years of teaching economics courses and economic history nothing so confuses students, and their elders, as the subject of money. Or rather I… »
Yankee Finance Capitalism Part II: The Jeffersonian Triumph by John Devanny
“The revenue of the state is the state.” Edmund Burke The rise of the modern nation state in the 1600s was founded upon monarchies securing independent sources of revenue to pay for the royal armies… »
Wednesday, March 22, 2017
Thursday, November 24, 2016
Saturday, October 22, 2016
The Tradition of Limited Government
Friday, June 03, 2016
Jefferson
The Chaos of a Hillary Clinton Presidency: Corporate Dominion and Open Rebellion by Richard W. Behan
Reform is neither difficult nor unprecedented. Our history displays a number of means of subordinating corporate interests to the welfare of the American people. More than a century ago—in the “Gilded Age”—the nation faced a similar crisis and dealt with it successfully. And a century before that, effective mechanisms were in place to restrain corporate dominion, even though the threat of it was already visible.
This is what Thomas Jefferson said about the issue: “I hope we shall crush… in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country.”
Note Jefferson’s concern was merely prospective, wary of potential. Corporate enterprise was not yet dominant, only pushing to be. At the time, corporations were very strongly circumscribed, to assure their subservience to public well-being. Perhaps Jefferson feared they would escape the control mechanisms early corporations faced:
*they were chartered for a limited period of time, typically twenty years
*they were chartered for a single specific purpose, say to construct a toll road
*the charter could be revoked if the corporation’s behavior violated public interests
*stockholders, directors, and officers of the corporation were personally responsible for the corporation’s obligations or transgressions
* a corporation could not buy or otherwise merge with another corporation
Mr. Jefferson’s fears were realized.
As the 1800’s progressed corporations in America—particularly the great railroads—fought vigorously and successfully to have these constraints relaxed, and all of them were. The corporate structure escaped any meaningful public control.
Eventually corporations could grow without limit by absorbing others; they could live in perpetuity; they could undertake multiple tasks and change them at will. Personal liability was limited to a pittance, and charter revocation virtually disappeared. Then, in 1866, corporations as artificial persons became legal persons: the Supreme Court case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad extended the rights of U.S. citizenship to corporate entities. They were granted equal protection under the law, their rights protected by the U.S. Constitution. (The grant of legal personhood, Thom Hartmann discovered, was technically illegal, but it has endured. See his book, Unequal Protection.)
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
Lincoln's America
Friday, October 23, 2015
Thursday, October 22, 2015
Kevin Gutzman on Alexander Hamilton
A Founding Father gets his due—in a hip-hop musical.
Hamilton
Also, America's Kingly Constitution.
Saturday, July 04, 2015
Another Independence Day
I've been seeing a lot of Muslim veils at the local Costco in Sunnyvale. When will the Supreme Court rule on polygamy for Muslims?
"Let it burn." There is a temptation to sit back and enjoy the decline. How do men respond rightly and with dignity to hostile forces seeking to subjugate them and to convert them to an ideology that hates Christianity? MGTOW is one solution, even if wrong-headed when taken as an absolute rejection of certain goods, but it does allow a man to live his life on his own terms rather than submitting to someone who does not have rightful authority over him. RooshV has recently begun formulating a more positive account of men, which he calls "neo-masculinity."
Resignation may be the only option, but this is not the same as capitulation.
Still, while we breathe what can we do to resist those forces and to promote the good life? For what purpose should men organize? What is worth saving? Traditional conservatives know the answers to these questions, though some Americans may have forgotten the role scale plays in setting limits. When do we withhold pearls (such as friendship but not charity) from "swine"? How do we treat those who are not only hostile to our values but seek to harm us financially or worse? Vox Day has taken one course of action -- there may be a lucky few who live in a community which has some measure of economic autarky and do not have to worry about boycotts and being fired and such. But what of those who are stuck in the megacities?
To be continued...
Independence from What? by Mike Maharrey
Uncelebrating the Fourth by Harry Browne
Thomas Jefferson's Legacy by Dave Benner