Showing posts with label corporations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corporations. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 02, 2020

The Axis of Wokeness



Sunday, August 16, 2020

The Network State



Axis of Easy Salon #17

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Last in the Debate Series

Thursday, July 09, 2020

Corporations



Edit.
See also:

Sunday, May 17, 2020

Justifying an Investigation of Them



Friday, April 03, 2020

Tuesday, December 11, 2018

Do We Really Need Catholics to Praise Entertainment Products?

I have posted some trailers of things produced by Netflix -- does the good outweigh the bad? How can we diminish the powers of corporations to reshape culture if we continue to give them money?

The Brilliant and Profoundly Catholic Daredevil by BRADLEY J. BIRZER
Netflix has canceled the single best thing currently on the screen, big or small.

Thursday, January 11, 2018

Let Twitter Bleed the Money



The company is reprehensible but they will just push people to find alternatives.

Friday, June 03, 2016

Jefferson

A consistent liberal?


The Chaos of a Hillary Clinton Presidency: Corporate Dominion and Open Rebellion by Richard W. Behan

Reform is neither difficult nor unprecedented. Our history displays a number of means of subordinating corporate interests to the welfare of the American people. More than a century ago—in the “Gilded Age”—the nation faced a similar crisis and dealt with it successfully. And a century before that, effective mechanisms were in place to restrain corporate dominion, even though the threat of it was already visible.

This is what Thomas Jefferson said about the issue: “I hope we shall crush… in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country.”

Note Jefferson’s concern was merely prospective, wary of potential. Corporate enterprise was not yet dominant, only pushing to be. At the time, corporations were very strongly circumscribed, to assure their subservience to public well-being. Perhaps Jefferson feared they would escape the control mechanisms early corporations faced:

*they were chartered for a limited period of time, typically twenty years

*they were chartered for a single specific purpose, say to construct a toll road

*the charter could be revoked if the corporation’s behavior violated public interests

*stockholders, directors, and officers of the corporation were personally responsible for the corporation’s obligations or transgressions

* a corporation could not buy or otherwise merge with another corporation

Mr. Jefferson’s fears were realized.

As the 1800’s progressed corporations in America—particularly the great railroads—fought vigorously and successfully to have these constraints relaxed, and all of them were. The corporate structure escaped any meaningful public control.

Eventually corporations could grow without limit by absorbing others; they could live in perpetuity; they could undertake multiple tasks and change them at will. Personal liability was limited to a pittance, and charter revocation virtually disappeared. Then, in 1866, corporations as artificial persons became legal persons: the Supreme Court case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad extended the rights of U.S. citizenship to corporate entities. They were granted equal protection under the law, their rights protected by the U.S. Constitution. (The grant of legal personhood, Thom Hartmann discovered, was technically illegal, but it has endured. See his book, Unequal Protection.)

Wednesday, December 02, 2015

Coca Cola: Why Corporations are Our Enemies

There is a Coke commercisl featuring a mom giving her young son some cokes so he can use them as an icebreaker to talk to a young girl at a dance. It played before a movie last month; I can't find it online, so I don't know how old it is. Where's the father to tell his son to man up or gie him some age-appropriate advice? nowhere to be seen. Instead, the boy is taught to offer the girl a drink. How beta is that?
And moms can feel like they can take dad's by purchasing a product for their sons to use, rather than giving him the proper guidance. What a joke.

And then there's its #MakeItHappy campaign...


Looking at the channel and its advertising in different languages, Coca Cola Global is spreading "sweet American goodness" around the world and the modern distorted notion of Christmas, focused exclusively on family. (And of course none of the Spanish commercials feature non-whites.)


Thursday, July 09, 2015

There's a Disney Channel Korea

Yes, there is.

Nine members of SMROOKIES will be the "mouseketeers" on Disney Channel Korea's new reboot of "#TheMickeyMouseClub"! M-I-C-K-E-Y M-O-U-S-E~

Posted by Soompi on Thursday, July 9, 2015

Fight the corporation.

Saturday, July 04, 2015

"The Empty Seat"

Someone linked to this commercial, which was released last year, on FB.



Props for Guinness because it meant well, even though America's wars of the last century is a more controverted issue, especially with the questionable relationship to Independence Day? (As opposed to Memorial or Veterans Day.) Then I remember the decision it made to withdraw sponsorship of the St. Patrick's Day Parade in NYC because SJW. (Its ad for the holy day.) No thanks to the manipulation of emotions for the sake of profit.

IrishCentral: Inspiring new Guinness ad pays tribute to our heroes this 4th of July

Thursday, February 12, 2015

DC Going Down the SJ Path

DC Comics announces massive shakeup, 24 new comics with focus on diversity

If they weren't being subsidized by Warner Brothers, would the company go out of business?

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Who Controls "Organic"?


Saturday, February 08, 2014

More on the Coca-Cola CM



The commercial was aired tonight during NBC's broadcast of the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympic Games.

Monday, February 03, 2014

Paying Lip Service to Multliculturalism to Gain Customers



90-second version




It's Beautiful in English
It's Beautiful in Tagalog

What else should we expect from large multinational corporations? Their loyalty is to mammon, and endorsing the proposition nation serves that end.

Corporations are not friends of the polity, and their use of mass media for advertising also furthers an ideology at the same time.

VDare
The Spearhead
CHT

Jack Hunter rebranding himself?