Showing posts with label libertarianism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label libertarianism. Show all posts

Friday, September 03, 2021

Moldbug Interview

Sunday, March 21, 2021

Still Grifting

Friday, January 22, 2021

Amash Looking for a New Grift

Norman I will excuse for now, but Amash, the professional politician, I won't.

Monday, January 18, 2021

Taleb May be Wrong on Trump

But his take on localism is ok.



Tuesday, October 13, 2020

The Day of Right Libertarianism/Paleolibertarianism Is Over





C. Jay Engel's essay in the October issue of Chronicles:

Sunday, September 06, 2020

Wilhelm Röpke's Liberalism

Saturday, September 05, 2020

Subsidiarity

WHAT STATES CAN'T DO by Andrew Willard Jones I'm not going to take the time to cover all of the problems in both essays. With regards to Black's reply: Subsidiarity was always an unsuccessful attempt to deal with the state; authority proper to a political community does not scale up, and organization of political communities requires something other than the unitary state and its centralization of authority which it usurps. If we're going to try to discern political relationships in Genesis, perhaps the first political community, if it were truly self-sufficient with respect to political goods was constituted by Adam and Eve. But the more important political relationship would have been the one existing between Adam and his sons Cain and Abel, not as father and sons, but as political equals. (And I disagree with Filmer and his Patriarcha on this point.) With regards to the reply of Jones and Barnes to Black: While the production of virtue is an end of the political community, it is an end order to the primary end of the political community, which is political life or life in civic friendship. The state cannot produce virtue but it can produce habits in those subject to it. These habits are useful to those who are rule and make a man good for a particular (bad) regime, but not good simply. The family does have a role to play in forming its members in virtue, but because the family is an incomplete society, the formation it offers must be done in conjunction with the formation offered by the political community. The father has a role to play in educating his sons, but other men in that community have roles to play as well, and the goal of that formation is not to erase the inequality that exists between father and son by nature (as "biological" cause and effect) but to elevate the son to the status of a political equal in the case of a republican regime. As for using the mystical language of the Bridegroom and the Bride the Church to explain this, that has its own problems. Just one word on the mystical marriage of the Son and the Church: much of Latin theologizing about the mystical marriage involves imposing of human ideals and norms regarding marriage, and we see how ideas about "equality" and even "complementarity" influence theology. Even when the ministers of the Church are ordered to the ministry of the sacraments, this is not the Church being "given power over the distribution of God's grace" (what a Latin way of thinking about it), but the Church serving the Bridegroom, Christ, to whom She is conformed.

Tuesday, August 04, 2020

A Challenge to Libertarians

Thursday, June 18, 2020

Because During a Collapse, the Austrian School Is Still Relevant

Wednesday, June 17, 2020

Tuesday, June 09, 2020

Trying to Stay Relevant

Sunday, June 07, 2020

More from the Principled Libertarian

Friday, May 29, 2020

The Libtard Solution



The solution is to permit the rise of organic communities which will police themselves through a common culture, standards of behavior, and virtues. That won't solve the crime problem, but it will allow communities to separate themselves from the mess that the state has created.

Saturday, May 23, 2020

Freedom of Association

Freedom of association is important, but this essay strikes me as a typical libertarian/liberal exposition of that freedom. We can agree that there is a freedom of association, or a right of association, which cannot be infringed upon by some [higher] political authority.

Public Discourse: Reviving the Freedom of Association by Nathanael Blake

Blake builds upon this book from Kansas University Press: Why Associations Matter: The Case for First Amendment Pluralism by Luke C. Sheahan.

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

John Paul II Was a Libertarian!

Samuel Gregg doesn't make this actual claim but he wants to appropriate John Paul II for liberalism.


Centesimus Annus is often praised—rightly, in my view—for being the modern social encyclical most attentive to economics as a social science. This owed much to John Paul II’s willingness to meet and have serious discussions with prominent economists who themselves occupied a variety of positions on the economic policy spectrum while the encyclical was being drafted.

Economics is a practical science; academics need to take shortcuts and make assumptions about human behavior in order to have predictive models because the system with which they deal is too big.

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

A Catholic Liberal

or libertarian... Samuel Gregg.

A true believer in the oligarch's "free markets" and "free trade"...








Law and Liberty podcast

Makes me question if Acton himself was able to make the connection between his brand of liberalism and the loss of political liberty that he supposedly feared. Maybe Acton was just another intellectual whoring himself out for the elites.


Monday, May 11, 2020

A Libertarian Makes the Case for Localism



And Latins gonna Latin...


The purpose of self-defense do not require the existence of a unitary state.

Tuesday, May 05, 2020

Taleb Shreds Libertarians




Sunday, May 03, 2020