Showing posts with label family. Show all posts
Showing posts with label family. Show all posts

Friday, August 06, 2021

Bet There Won't Be Research on the Importance of Men as Fathers and Husbands



Tuesday, June 08, 2021

Family Farm and One's Narrative

Tuesday, June 01, 2021

Repudiate Feminism

Otherwise messaging such as this rings hollow.

Thursday, December 03, 2020

Chivalry Isn't Dead

Plenty of white-knighting still happens. Aubrey Huff still catching flack from blue-pilled professional "conservatives" and "Christians" for failing to adhere to the Churchian "man up" message wrt to single moms. If they can't get intersexual dynamics right, they have no credibility with respect to politike.



Blue-pilled Scott Hahn on marriage and politike -- it's all theory, not based on experience of either family or a true political community (as opposed to a university or parish "community"). He has revealed in anecdotes that he is not a true leader in his marriage. (I'm disregarding contemporary pussyfooting, e.g. "servant leadership," or some other counterfeit.) So-called "conservative" or "Christian" experts and pontificators on marriage and relationships, especially if they are male feminists, deserved to be scrutinized closely, along with their home lives, and that is not an ad hominem fallacy. The Natural Law will not be mocked be mocked by their behavior and words.

The First Society: The Sacrament of Matrimony and the Restoration of the Social Order by Scott Hahn

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

Given Who's Involved, I Expect 0 Discussion of Feminism

Tuesday, September 15, 2020

CWR Review of Restoring Humanity

CWR: Restoring Humanity offers theological foundations for rebuilding Catholic culture by Michael P. Krom Jared Staudt’s new book argues that culture is nourished at home and in the parish, then strengthened and refined at the university.
Restoring Humanity: Essays on the Evangelization of Culture by R. Jared Staudt
Is culture important? Yes. But are some parts of culture more important for others? Can one speak of preserving or passing on a culture if one does not have a community? The family is insufficient for the passing on of a culture, it must do this as a part of a political community, and the children of that family, when they are of age, must marry children from other families. The moral culture is of first importance for a community; without it a community cannot be stable enough for the keeping of intellectual culture and the arts. And while Christian intellectual culture is important for the living of the faith, it is doubtful that all of the Western Christian tradition needs to be preserved in a single community or handed on as a part of "liberal education." So some treasures (e.g. the liturgy, Holy Scripture) are more important than others.

Thursday, July 16, 2020

SoCon Hustling

Saturday, May 23, 2020

Freedom of Association

Freedom of association is important, but this essay strikes me as a typical libertarian/liberal exposition of that freedom. We can agree that there is a freedom of association, or a right of association, which cannot be infringed upon by some [higher] political authority.

Public Discourse: Reviving the Freedom of Association by Nathanael Blake

Blake builds upon this book from Kansas University Press: Why Associations Matter: The Case for First Amendment Pluralism by Luke C. Sheahan.

Wednesday, May 20, 2020

The Soulmate Myth



Who's more likely to stay idealistic about "soulmates" even through a failed relationship/marriage or two? Men or women? And is the women's "soulmate" ideal anything more than an alpha male? Who's more likely to initiatie divorce because they are no longer satisfied by their spouse? Wilcox isn't going to talk about the problem of feminism and unrestrained hypergamy - female and male feminist donors would stop financially supporting him.

Sunday, December 29, 2019

Thursday, March 21, 2019

Monday, February 25, 2019

Not quite the Captain-First Mate Model

OrthoChristian: A BRIEF REFLECTION ON MALE HEADSHIP by Dr. David C. Ford

Of course, every husband, as the servant-head, should always be seeking the input of his wife in the decision-making processes, which should always be decidedly mutual, with decisions being reached virtually always by consensus. Similarly, the husband should also be steadily encouraging his wife to contribute greatly to the marital enterprise as a whole, with all her particular strengths and gifts as well.

So it is of paramount importance for everyone to know and remember that this role of male headship, especially in marriage, is meant to be fulfilled with a deep sense and vision of self-sacrificial servanthood. This requires the husband in a real sense to always be laying down his life for his wife and children, which means very often putting their needs and desires ahead of his own, or in place of his own.

Wednesday, January 02, 2019

Saturday, August 20, 2016

The Catholic Thing: Note from the Present Underground by James V. Schall, S.J.

Tuesday, August 09, 2016

Alternatives to the Benedict Option?

Tolkien Alternatives to the “Benedict Option” by David Michael Phelps

Rod Dreher: Benedict Option Countries

Hope in Eastern Europe? Maybe not.

Bruce Frohnen:

At a conference I attended recently (convened to address contemporary challenges to Christian culture) one speaker faced head-on a central problem with Christian responses to our secular culture: As a rule, we do not have enough children and we do not teach them from a young age their essential familial roles as male breadwinners and female nurturers. For any Catholic, and any Christian who has taken the time to understand the fundamentals of our beliefs and traditions, it is undeniable that the sexes are different and are by nature suited to different roles within the fundamental unit of society, namely, the natural family. The vast majority of thinking Christians know this while the vast majority of secular Westerners reject it as a matter of unthinking ideological prejudice, so there really is no sense at this late date in attempting to argue over it. This is at the root of Rod Dreher’s “Benedict Option” proposal for Christians to concentrate their efforts on rebuilding faithful communities in the face of the cultural aggression of our public institutions.

Saturday, April 02, 2016

Stanford Anscombe Society Third Annual Conference

THE FAMILY UNITED
MARRIAGE AS A FORCE FOR SOCIAL GOOD


Speakers include W. Bradford Wilcox; I'm not sure if he can be counted as a supporter of traditional patriarchy, but he's probably the only reason I'd consider attending.