Showing posts with label ethnonationalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ethnonationalism. Show all posts

Sunday, May 01, 2022

Someone Didn't Learn from MacIntyre Properly

MacIntyre may have denounced the nation-state but he also denounces its regime, which Adam DeVille fails to understand, instead promoting the fiction that we live in a "democracy":

White Christian nationalism motivates the anti-democratic, authoritarian, and violent impulses on display in our current political moment. The future of American democracy, Gorski and Perry argue, will depend on whether a broad spectrum of Americans―stretching from democratic socialists to classical liberals―can unite in a popular front to combat the threat to liberal democracy posed by white Christian nationalism.


Just because you're an academic doesn't mean you have political wisdom.

The Utter Fatuousness of All Nationalisms

Monday, July 26, 2021

TOKYO GORIN ONDO 2020 (Music Video)



The official dance for this year's Globalist Games, which were supposed to be held last year.

Friday, March 12, 2021

Grand Oligarchy Party Priorities

Thursday, February 18, 2021

'Allo 'Allo!

Someone is aware of using someone photogenic to market their ideas.






Tuesday, December 29, 2020

Liberal Communitarian?

How can this be possible? It can be possible when one is trying to reason away exceptions for one's own people. Even George acknowledges that Sacks promoted the lie that is "Judeo-Christianity." Does Sacks concede that a love of one's own ethnos is not only valid but normative for Western European peoples?



Wednesday, December 02, 2020

Global Oligarchs at Work



Meanwhile...

Saturday, September 05, 2020

Leftists Are Ok With This

But they would not be ok with this:

Friday, July 24, 2020

German Nationalism

Thursday, June 11, 2020

Defund Conservatism, Inc.



The money should be spent on prepping for the future.

Dreher's latest in which he admits that he doesn't know what is to be done, except not X. He is right about one thing: traditional Americans should stop funding their enemies.



Cultural Marxism in action in colleges and universities:

Tuesday, June 02, 2020

Sure

And an ethnos is just an really extended family.

Monday, May 18, 2020

Dreher Talks about His Forthcoming Book

And he talks about the QAnon stuff in a Dreherian way... Going to skip over that.



QAnon & Living By Lies:
As you regular readers know, this book is about the creeping “soft totalitarianism” in our society, and what Christian dissidents who lived under Soviet bloc communism can tell us about how to recognize it and resist it. In its most simple definition, “totalitarianism” is a word used to describe a state in which all things are politicized. The key difference between authoritarianism and totalitarianism is in the first, the state only seeks a monopoly on political action, whereas in the latter, the state wants to command all aspects of life, and — this is key — to compel not only obedience, but internal assent. As Winston Smith was told, you must learn to love Big Brother.

The word was invented in fascist Italy, but has been applied both to Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, and its vassals. One consistent story that we have heard from anti-communist dissidents is that the entire system was built on lies — that is, on the willingness of people to assent to lies. Vaclav Havel (who was not a Christian) said that the only resistance available to people under communism, where it was impossible to build political opposition, was to seek to “live in truth” — that is, to refuse to participate in lies. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was even more emphatic on this point. The title of my book is taken from his final message to the Soviet people in 1974, on the eve of his expulsion from the country. That essay, “Live Not By Lies,” urged readers to engage in passive resistance to the regime of lies: that is, to refuse to say, or to appear to say, something that they believe is untrue, just to keep the peace.
How far does resistance go? In this respect perhaps Herbert McCabe was more daring -- I will get that post published soon.

Kant's Categorical Imperative Is Irrelevant

Saturday, May 16, 2020

There Is No Human Solution to Sin



Nationalism is not the primary problem; the primary problem is still the state. But even if the state were to fragment into republics organized on a human scale, there would always be the tendency for some to attempt to consolidate and centralize again because of disordered self-love and pride, whether it be in the name of ethnic unity or defense from outsiders or the "common good." At best we can achieve an international order based on mutual respect, or at least the desire not to get entangled with the affairs of others, and that is only if everyone is converted to Christ. Until then, there will be strife and no non-ethnic internationalism is going to prevent that without accumulating power to the few.

Monday, May 11, 2020

What a Cuck.

Victim of the German guilt complex. The Japanese don't suffer from it.



S. Trifkovic: Reflections on Victory in Europe, 75 Years Later

Sunday, May 03, 2020

Paul Gottfried Reviews R.R. Reno's Latest Book

The Agonist: The Gutless Persuasion on the Return of the Strong Gods by Paul Gottfried

Let me also note that what held together ancient democracies, and what Rousseau properly observed as their strength, was homonoia, a loyalty to the polity, its cult and its history. Today it is doubtful that our football fans embody the same shared sentiments. Reno fails to see that a democracy of, say, 10,000 citizens with the same cultural and moral principles wouldn’t practice self-government in a more meaningful sense than sports enthusiasts bellowing out the national anthem. Certainly, size and heterogeneity affect the quality of a democracy. Still, I wouldn’t expect Russell Reno to concede something so obvious, unless it were in his professional interest.

I think that one sentence should be: "Reno fails to see that a democracy of, say, 10,000 citizens with the same cultural and moral principles would..."

Wednesday, April 29, 2020

Robert Sarah and Pope Francis Ideologically Aligned?

CLJ: Cardinal Sarah's Warning to the West by Chase Padusniak

While the African prelate sometimes sounds not unlike a vocal America-first Catholic, a thoughtful reading of his statements make clear that these are incidental similarities, not ideological concurrences. Take, for example, his stance on the European refugee crisis. In an interview with the French magazine Valeurs Actuelles, he appeared to contradict Pope Francis’s position on immigration, saying “It is better to help people flourish in their culture than to encourage them to come to a Europe in full decadence . . . It is a false exegesis to use the word of God to promote migration.”

His reasoning, however, is not that migrants pollute or corrupt the cultures they enter. Instead, in The Day is Now Far Spent, he notes that Europe displays oligarchic tendencies.

Sarah is concerned that migrants will be corrupted by the host societies; but he is concerned with the ethnic and cultural changes that mass migration brings as well. The choice of "pollute" or "corrupt" to characterize the odiousness of "America-first" Catholics or conservatives is most likely deliberately, but even Aquinas warns against having too many foreigners in a polis in terms of the harmful effects they will have on the rule of law.

As for "oligarchic tendencies," those tendencies are much more than that, they are the system and the state. In fact, Sarah himself would probably use stronger language than that to describe the state. Similarly, many "America-first" American patriots are also concerned with the oligarchy in this country, and how it profits off importing foreign workers. Are "America-first" Catholics aligned with Pope Francis, then? Does Pope Francis see things that way?

This is the sort of fluff piece aimed at downplaying what might be taken as "extremist views" from a churchman yet untouched by scandal and who is popular among "conservative" Catholics.

Tuesday, April 28, 2020

False Dichotomy


Saturday, April 25, 2020

Race Unrealism

Those who are mixed ethnic parentage will probably have even more difficulty finding an identity in an atomized world. We are probably passed the point for successful wide-scale solutions and attempts at social re-engineering.



America

Wednesday, April 22, 2020

The First Wave of English Nationalism?

Medievalists.net: How England got its name (1014-1030)
- the paper itself by George Beech.
Introduction: The creation of a new ethnic identity of the English people was one of the most important developments of the later Anglo-Saxon period from the ninth to the eleventh centuries. Five centuries earlier, there had been no political or linguistic unity among the different peoples of German/Danish origin who had settled in the country and who spoke different dialects and were ruled by a handful of small tribal kingdoms. Then, from the reign of King Alfred onwards, Scandinavian invasions and the rise of dynasty of Wessex gradually led to the emergence of a single kingdom controlling most of the land and population, and to the belief that the English constituted a single community bound together by common descent, cultural tradition, language, church and loyalty to the king. In the later stages of this development, around 1000 AD, a new name, Engla land, came to be attached to the kingdom of the English and it has lasted until the present day as one of the most famous and long-lived the later country tenth names in European history.