Showing posts with label Sebastian Junger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sebastian Junger. Show all posts

Monday, July 05, 2021

Tool of the Statists and the Revolutionaries

Saturday, May 29, 2021

Alas, More Revelations

Is Junger a ticket taker? Or a true believer who is being promoted because he is an ally? Regardless, what could he possibly have to say about "liberty" or "freedom" when he thinks we live in a "free democracy" and that Trump represents fascism?





The same could be said of the scouting movement, which has become subordinate to statism and the ruling ideologies of the age. Will scouting ever be a means for building up masculinity and real political virtue? I don't think so.

Wednesday, May 26, 2021

Sebastian Junger on American Warrior Radio


Sebastian Junger Interview



This is a more questionable association.

Thursday, May 20, 2021

Sebastian Junger Being Pious?

accepting his father's POV regarding the Spanish Civil War? Was his father a Communist? Junger may have some good things to say about being part of a tribe, but here he just parrots the revolutionary narrative about the Spanish Civil War and "fascism," and TIME is glad to publish it in their war against Red Americans.



A reminder of what the revolutionaries are currently attempting in Spain:

Wednesday, May 19, 2021

Sebastian Junger on the Tension Between Individualism and Dependence

Thursday, May 13, 2021

Feedom




Monday, May 03, 2021

Freedom!

Saturday, April 17, 2021

Freedom!



Related:



Find your tribe.

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Peak Prosperity Interview with Sebastian Junger

Peak Prosperity: Sebastian Junger: Is Our Material Wealth Undermining Our Happiness & Health?

So if you can't defend yourself against an outside group like that, you’re in enormous danger. That's one great threat to the welfare of a community. The other great threat is the community splitting because of that moral conflict. Often those moral conflicts are the results of unfairness. So unfairness within the society can be as dangerous as an enemy outside the society and typically, they’ve done a lot of genetic studies of this. Liberalism and conservatism are not just political ways of thinking in modern America. They those says of seeing the world go way, way back and they’re genetically encoded into us.

So there are genetic conservatives whose primary fear is threat from the outside. Conservatives are oriented toward an outside threat in a very basic sense. Genetic liberals are oriented towards an internal threat. An abuse of power. Unfairness. That kind of thing. The genetics for these political viewpoints are divided roughly 50-50 in the population. So essentially what you have is, in any human community about half the people they’re worried about outside threats and half the people are worried about internal problems. In a kind of stasis. I mean, you sort of need both just like you need both men and women in the society.

So the trick is to sort of balance those very, very legitimate concerns. But they’re sort of antithetical to each other. So like the _____ [00:15:47] sort of moral hierarchies that are good at protecting the society from an outside threat are terrible when it comes to things like that within the society. So that's where you need government. That's where you need wise government and you need the two opposing parties to acknowledge that each one needs the other in order to correctly…in order to protected and run the country in a proper way.

The distinction being made here is not between "conservatives" and "liberals" but between "Republicans" and "Democrats" but both parties serve the state and the oligarchy. (Whether it can be claimed that the Democratic Party, before the rise of urban mass population centers in the industrial period, was not statist I have not investigated yet.)

It is men who would be concerned both with external threats and internal threats arising from injustice committed by other men, and men who would be protecting the community from both threats and maintaining the common good and order -- men are the backbone of the republican form of polity ; female moral psychology is such that it is less concerned with justice and more with outcome, and this is of use to the state, which seeks to increase its power.

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

Monday, January 21, 2019

More with Sebastian Junger





Junger misses the imapct of identity politics.






Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Sebastian Junger Has a New Book Out

Tribe: On Homecoming and Belonging



Jack Donovan reviews it: Tribalism is Not Humanitarianism - STW Episode 17

If Donovan's characterization of the book is correct, then it certainly does fall short of the truth about tribes and community.

NPR story







Man, just missed him in Corte Madera.

Related:
Sebastian Junger's twitter and FB

Sunday, June 07, 2015

Sebastian Junger on PTSD

How PTSD Became a Problem Far Beyond the Battlefield

Any discussion of PTSD and its associated sense of alienation in society must address the fact that many soldiers find themselves missing the war after it’s over. That troubling fact can be found in written accounts from war after war, country after country, century after century. Awkward as it is to say, part of the trauma of war seems to be giving it up. There are ancient human behaviors in war—loyalty, inter-reliance, cooperation—that typify good soldiering and can’t be easily found in modern society. This can produce a kind of nostalgia for the hard times that even civilians are susceptible to: after World War II, many Londoners claimed to miss the communal underground living that characterized life during the Blitz (despite the fact that more than 40,000 civilians lost their lives). And the war that is missed doesn’t even have to be a shooting war: “I am a survivor of the AIDS epidemic,” a man wrote on the comment board of an online talk I gave about war. “Now that AIDS is no longer a death sentence, I must admit that I miss those days of extreme brotherhood … which led to deep emotions and understandings that are above anything I have felt since the plague years.”

What all these people seem to miss isn’t danger or loss, per se, but the closeness and cooperation that danger and loss often engender. Humans evolved to survive in extremely harsh environments, and our capacity for cooperation and sharing clearly helped us do that. Structurally, a band of hunter-gatherers and a platoon in combat are almost exactly the same: in each case, the group numbers between 30 and 50 individuals, they sleep in a common area, they conduct patrols, they are completely reliant on one another for support, comfort, and defense, and they share a group identity that most would risk their lives for. Personal interest is subsumed into group interest because personal survival is not possible without group survival. From an evolutionary perspective, it’s not at all surprising that many soldiers respond to combat in positive ways and miss it when it’s gone.