Showing posts with label Vatican II. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vatican II. Show all posts

Monday, October 11, 2021

Another Word on Fire Product

Saturday, May 29, 2021

Propping Up Paul VI and Vatican II

Saturday, March 27, 2021

Promoting the Brand and Vatican II

Tuesday, February 02, 2021

Pope of the Supercouncil





Audience with participants in the meeting promoted by the National Catechetical Office of the Italian Episcopal Conference, 30.01.2021

Tuesday, January 05, 2021

Why?

Does Nostra Aetate deal with Chalcedonian Orthodoxy? (No.)

Wednesday, December 30, 2020

A "Transmission Crisis"

Stephen Bullivant on Vatican II



Bullivant attemtps a nuanced view of Vatican II. But he is hampered in his analysis by his adherence to Latin ecclesiology and beliefs concerning primacy. Is mass culture a cause of the "transmission crisis"? Yes. But mass culture is insufficient to explain the fundamental weakness of the institutional churches (Latin and otherwise). Bullivant needs to dig deeper, as he apparently has not seen the studies showing that it is the father who has the most influence in the religious upbringing of his children. Either that, or he is unwilling to affirm the importance of patriarchy and believes he must appear to be egalitarian:

Religious practice in the home and as a family (including bothparents). This is the single biggest predictor of whether a child ends up as religious practicing adult, and there’s a whole social-scientific literature (which I discuss in Mass Exodus) around why. Basically, anything that you do becauseof what you believe, that you wouldn’t do if you didn’t believe, helps to inculcate the importance of those beliefs. Things that take time and effort – even really little things like grace before meals, praying when an ambulance passes – have a large cumulative power and effect.


And while he is aware of the importance of "community," he is probably unaware of what is required to go beyond "socializing" and create an actual community, namely, patriarchy:

Community. Fact is, we’re social beings, and we find it easiest to believe and practice when we hang out with ‘significant other’ who do so too. This is something we used to do very well, but – outside of very special locales, we’re not going back to the kinds of neighborhood parishes, where all or most of one’s neighbors are fellow Catholics. Such places aren’t absolutely impossible – Ave Maria, Florida, would be a thriving example – but they’re not really a scalable strategy. So the trick is to find various ‘hacks.’ No doubt there are things we could learn from both Mormons and megachurches on this score: Both tend to do it better than we do. But really, anything we can do to enable committed Catholics hanging out with other committed Catholics – and such families with other such families – is a plus. Think of it as a mini ‘Benedict Option’ (cf. Rod Dreher’s great book). Until Latins (and others) recognize this fundamental fact of family and political life, they will make no headway in reforming and strengthening their churches.


Wednesday, November 04, 2020

Is John Courtney Murray still relevant?

No, and the (Roman) Catholic moment has come and gone. Murray probably did not foresee the consequences of increased migration and the onset of identity politics.



Law and Liberty

Saturday, October 31, 2020

Two Views



Pope's Acceptance of Homosexuality Reveals the Dark Core of Roman Catholicism

A. I. Osipov: It turns out that today the Pope is questioning the most fundamental principles of morality, moral Christian teaching. And this is not surprising, because, starting with Pope John XXIII (he died back in 1963), all subsequent popes used the same phrase, which no one had ever used before them (before John XXIII). And, of course, Pope Francis repeats this with special force and emphasis.

N. Bulchuk: And what is this phrase?

A. I. Osipov: The fact is that John XXIII was the first to visit the Roman synagogue, and to the whole world he said: "You are our elder brothers." Moreover, here we are not talking about Jews, but about Judaism, for which Jesus Christ is a false messiah. Because he calls people to the Kingdom of God, which “is within us,” and not to the Kingdom of God, which people dream of building on the earth. So, all these are natural steps. Francis right now declares: he directly declares, this is again an unprecedented statement: "We and the Jews believe in one God." What does this phrase indicate? That Christ is no one for Francis! You and we believe in what God? In Jesus Christ, who is the Image of the Invisible God. Here, He, God, appeared in the form most accessible to human knowledge! .. Now think about what Francis says: "We have one god with the Jews." That is, it is possible to believe in “one god” without recognizing Christ? Calling Christ a false messiah? So, you see, how dogmatic or (which is more understandable for the general public) doctrinal truths to what extent are connected with the moral teaching of Christianity. And now ... Pope Francis has repeatedly, in hints, around and around, based on the context, expressed his point of view on this issue. But now he openly declared his opinion. And this, of course, excited a lot of people. But I would urge you not to be surprised and look at his personal spiritual state: how he demonstrates his humility in front of the whole world, in front of cameras, for example, kissing the feet of refugees or blacks, as well as other ostentatious "forces" that he throws out. So much for the Vatican! It’s time, perhaps, for the Orthodox to pay serious attention to this.

N. Bulchuk: But immediately the figure of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew comes to mind, who has recently been very close to Pope Francis ...

A. I. Osipov: Lately he has been flying to Rome every now and then, and only communicates with the Roman prelates. And by this he most obviously demonstrates his spirit. You see what a danger stands before us, before Orthodoxy! After all, this, it would seem, is Constantinople, the primordial Church, and what is it doing! It is no accident, by the way, that Constantinople has recently taken not only such a position, but has essentially gone into schism: this is what it means - communion with the spirit of the world, with the spirit of Catholicism!

Friday, October 16, 2020

Fr. Stravinskas on the First Things Podcast



Doing his part to hold up the Church of Rome, but I don't know which Roman Catholics will be persuaded.

Tuesday, August 11, 2020

Still at It



Wednesday, July 29, 2020

John Cavadini Weighs In on the Vatican II Controversy



CLJ

Is it not beautiful to be able to say, with the Catechism’s summary of conciliar teaching, that “Christ’s Spirit uses these [separated] Churches and ecclesial communities as means of salvation,” while qualifying that their “power derives from the fullness of grace and truth that Christ has entrusted to the Catholic Church” (CCC §819)?

The response is more a series of responses to particular points, whether than a point by point argument. I think Latins should go farther than the Council and admit that the schism is not from the Church but within the Church, following the example of Louis Bouyer. How many years will it take for this development to happen?

Monday, July 27, 2020

I Wouldn't Expect Him to Say Anything Different



Wednesday, July 22, 2020

A Latin Would Say This



Non-Latins will disagree on the status accorded to Vatican II by most Latins.

Wednesday, July 15, 2020

Another Open Letter

Thursday, July 02, 2020

Vatican II was the bomb, doncha know?

Wednesday, May 27, 2020

A Laughable Endorsement

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Written by an Opus Dei Member?

Did I link to the original Crisis article when it was first published?

Which reminds me of the allegation that Byzantine spirituality has been dominated too much by monastics... something to ponder.

Instead of "slave morality" do we have "wage-slave spirituality"?



(Imaginative Conservative)

Monday, April 08, 2019

A Faker All Along?

Or did he fail his vocation along the way? Thomas Merton.

Gary Wills reviews On Thomas Merton by Mary Gordon.

Rod Dreher's reaction, with some memories of Merton from Fr. Patrick Henry Reardon: Thomas Merton: Pious Fraud?