Leaders have been deceiving the masses forever. Jews begged Gideon to rule over them. Gideon answered, “I will not be your king.The Lord will rule over you”. Immediately Gideon ruled as king..never mentioning the Lord.Gideon even named his son Abimelech..meaning “son of the king”
— Jay Bart (@SimmonsBart) March 21, 2021
Monday, March 22, 2021
"Give Us a King"
Wednesday, January 27, 2021
While Rome Burns, This Is What Latin Integralists Do
An extraordinary summary of the monarchic elements of the ancient Spanish constitution by a 19th century Mercedarian and Carlist publicist and polemicist. https://t.co/z66qSfWk4M
— Ius & Iustitium (@iusetiustitium) January 26, 2021
Wednesday, November 25, 2020
Legitimism
Great article that goes into the basics of French Légitimité, Jacobitism, Miguelism, Carlism, Hapsburg Legitimism, etc. Their defeats led to the Liberalization of Europe and eventually affected the New World. https://t.co/ai4SYDdbvX
— Carolina Cavalier (@DixiePlanter) November 25, 2020
Thursday, November 12, 2020
Matilda: Empress, Queen, Warrior by Catherine Hanley
"Catherine Hanley’s accessible biography lifts Matilda from between the lines of recorded history to gives us a fascinating portrait of a woman who did not need to rule to be remembered." - Timothy D. Lusch for @ubookman: https://t.co/VrHjuURCsw pic.twitter.com/dkPc4wVLuR
— Russell Kirk Center (@KirkCenter) November 10, 2020
Yale University Press
Saturday, January 09, 2016
Who will rally to the Stuarts?
Once I Was a Clever Boy: Jacoabite Commemoration
On 8 January 2016, with the gracious permission of Her Majesty The Queen, the British Ambassador to the Holy See Nigel...
Posted by Vatican Radio - English Section on Saturday, January 9, 2016
Related:
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
800th Anniversary of the Magna Carta
Salisbury Cathedral
Magna Cartas united at British Library to celebrate 800th anniversary
Protecting rights of nobles at first, its meaning was then appropriated by the so-called republicans of the 16th and 17th centuries to encompass all Englishmen...
From England to America: Magna Carta and the Supremacy of Law by Russell Kirk
How well known was the story of King Arthur and his knights to the English elites of the 13th century?
Eric Bana to play King Arthur's father in Guy Ritchie's KNIGHTS OF THE ROUND TABLE!
I don't think he can top Boorman, even if he is doing a 6-movie series.
Thursday, November 28, 2013
Surprise Monarchists?
The nerds who would be kings?
I've seen the use of "Cathedral" before by Roissy. Did he get it from Yarvin? I'm anti-democracy, but that's because I'm a republican.
Sunday, May 12, 2013
An Argument for Monarchy
The monarch would be elected and not inherit his office from his father; this would be more in accordance with distributive justice.
Sunday, November 04, 2012
Kings and Pretenders

Managed to get some time to see Gwanghae [Masquerade] (광해, 왕이 된 남자) three Saturdays ago; it's good entertainment but it may be a bit incredible that someone of a rather "modest" background could be a better king than the real king. (I suppose it depends on what one thinks of the king - being an improvement may not take much.) Lee Byung Hun (이병헌) plays both King Gwanghae and the [gisang house] comedian/jester/entertainer who resembles the king. The comedian is recruited by the Royal Secretary ( Ryoo Seung-Ryong 류승룡) to pretend to be the king at night because the king fears for his life.
I was pulled in by the movie's visuals to think over the plot and issues. Such a pretty movie. But of course they had certain scenes to make it a tearjerker! Did it deserve to win Best Picture for this year's Daejong Awards, though? I don't deny that it is a sentimental crowd-pleaser, as evidenced by its box office pull. (Is Pietà the better movie?) One might think that the jester's awkward infatuation with the queen is a misstep in the story, but it seemed plausible to me that this would happen, since the jester is both a man and also rather attached to the royal institution, despite the failures of the king to secure justice. He might be tempted to take his playacting too far, falling in love with the queen having seen how beautiful she is. And it is understandable that this infatuation could never be resolved to his satisfaction; the queen recognizes the goodness in him but is faithful to the king. It is a good movie for LBH fans and those who are interested in Korean cinema, but the story is a bit shallow and simplistic even if it provides material for reflecting on the Korean monarchy and political theory in general.
*spoiler warning*
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Dr. Wilson, Jacobite sympathizer?
Yet a real monarchist must admit that the British executed and exiled their legitimate kings. The Stuarts had defects enough, Heaven knows, but they were royal defects. They had the best of British qualities—courage and intelligence such as nearly conquered the world. Something went badly wrong when the present line of petty German princelings was imported. The German princes were among the stupidest and most repulsive of all the European royals and unfitted to be symbols of a great Empire.
Saturday, June 09, 2012
I had some thoughts about the British monarchy and the diamond jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II's coronation, along with the politickin' of the Vatican, but I may not have a chance to publish them. In the meantime...
Peter Hitchens, Pop goes the Monarchy: The Queen listened to Paul McCartney - and I heard the end of the Royal Family
Brendan O’Neill, The revolutionary potential of the Queen’s English
Thursday, December 16, 2010
To Kill a King
I really should read more about the English Civil War though -- any suggestions?
Fairfax, Cromwell et. al.: Republicans seeking to preserve that tradition in England? Or radical revolutionaries? The movie shows Fairfax to be more of the former, while Cromwell is more of the latter, even though the note at the end of the movie seems to support Cromwell, crediting him as a precursor to the French Revolution, which brought upon us the modern political age. (I don't think it was meant to be ironic. It states that a king was restored to the throne, and that England has not been a republic since.)
Apparently English Catholics tended to side with Charles I -- because he was Catholic? Or because they had a stronger affection for the monarchy, or were more loyal and obedient (as they understood those virtues)?
How should Catholics judge the Stuart cause? Could one support it without agreeing with his absolutist claims? And if the king denies that there are any legal limits to his authority, can anything be done to curb his power except by force (and maybe the installation of a new monarch)? And is it too radical for a society with a tradition of hereditary monarchy to cast it off in favor of a new method of appointing the monarchy?
An internet essay on the English Civil War.
Rotten Tomatoes (trailer)
youtube
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
The President should give his aunt a civics lesson
What an entitlement complex, and it isn't limited to Obama's aunt (or Obama for that matter) -- the same could be said of all radical democrats (as defined by Plato and Aristotle). See John C. Médaille, On Democracy and Kings.
CNN: Bill Clinton on how he lost weight
I can't stand the man, so I won't watch the video, but I'd be interested to read what low-carb proponents say about it.
Are dying languages worth saving? (via EB)
Mike Whitney, Housing: The Swelling Backlog
Also from Counterpunch:
