"Experts" Advise Against Wearing Masks

Some health experts questioning advice against wider use of masks to slow spread of COVID-19
The coronavirus question: To mask or not to mask

This is the Chief Public Health Officer of Canada and head of the Public Health Agency of Canada, Dr. Theresa Tam. She sounds like she has a Canto/HK accent. I don't care about her credentials -- but it isn't too much to ask someone with her supposed intelligence to learn how to speak English like a native. She is a reminder of how meritocracy has been subverted through immigration by the state or its elites to undermine national identity.



And a recent Twitter thread on the use of masks.

Chris Martenson has a critique of her "expert" recommendations:


I note that she is also a member of the Independent Oversight and Advisory Committee for the WHO Health Emergencies Programme - another strike against WHO. Another cog in the alliance between WHO and China?

And of course the MSM in Canada is simply parroting the opinions of these "experts." We experienced the same thing in the US, with the CDC, but now the official opinion may be turning towards a more pro-mask-wearing stance.

NEW: CDC guidance on masks expected to change in next 10 days. Americans will be advised to wear masks in everyday life. Current recommendation is for high-risk groups only.

— Matt McCarthy (@DrMattMcCarthy) March 28, 2020

Statist BS from a secular state:

Parenting while #physicaldistancing can be stressful. Take a moment for yourself. It’s important for your #mentalhealth. Try meditating, working out or taking a bath. #COVID19 #stayhome pic.twitter.com/jkVTxSZujD

— Health Canada and PHAC (@GovCanHealth) April 1, 2020

2/4 #PhysicalDistancing can put a strain on our mental health, ↑ feelings of isolation & loneliness. It helps to remember that while #TogetherApart, we are all joined as Canadians in a collective effort.#COVID19 #WeWillGetThroughThis #cavabienaller

— Dr. Theresa Tam (@CPHO_Canada) April 2, 2020

Updated:

IYI bureaucrats opposed to masks used (bogus) arguments abt the protection of the wearer ("not perfect", etc.)

They didn't think that since it ALSO prevents (more effectively) ASYMPTOMATIC sick pple from spreading it, there wd be yuuge systemic effect.

PS: @WHO is a fraud.

— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) April 2, 2020