What is ANTIFA?

What is ANTIFA? An “idea” or a terrorist organization?

Leading expert @ShidelerK and I go deep and take a close look at the history, tactics, and funding.

If you want to know what’s going on in the world and why, watch Jack Murphy Live!https://t.co/AY1LJaMrR3

— Jack Murphy 🇺🇸 ⚔️ (@jackmurphylive) October 7, 2020

Paul Gottfried on Using Useful Idiots

The best-case scenario might be that the Left merely sees riots as politically advantageous at the moment, and will not actually mainstream them as a general form of politics. But you never know. https://t.co/iD6PofJkYM

— The American Conservative (@amconmag) September 14, 2020

AmConMag

Jack Murphy Interviews the Portland Camerman

ANTIFA Murder Cameraman - Is he in on it?

Antifa Murder Cameraman interviewed by Jack Murphy Live.

A gang of people stalked and executed a man. Justin recorded the entire thing. Listen as I dig deep into what happened and his role in it.https://t.co/DJ4dQESbgZ

— Jack Murphy 🇺🇸 (@jackmurphylive) September 5, 2020

https://t.co/mGKnQRM4cv

— Jack Murphy 🇺🇸 (@jackmurphylive) September 5, 2020

A Revolutionary Lies and Dies Later That Day

Building the Brand?

New blog from Sheepdog Response. FULL READ HERE: https://t.co/wG1H5QuEc6

Sheepdog Response went to check out the protests and riots in Portland about a week ago. A friend of ours is a freelance journalist that usually travels...#sheepdogresponse #alwaysbeready @TimKennedyMMA pic.twitter.com/md93t6gidl

— Sheepdog Response (@SDResponse) August 5, 2020

Sheepdog Response Blog

Same Roles Present in the HK Protests

So who trained whom? Or is there really a dark web that has this sort of information available for protestors, as I've seen reported?

Incredible graphic that explains all the various roles protestors play at riots.

I personally saw almost all of these in action. Add in medics and food suppliers as well. pic.twitter.com/aG4WKYGair

— Jack Murphy 🇺🇸 (@jackmurphylive) July 17, 2020

HKers did it better.

UN Walks One Back

UN Deletes Pro-Antifa Tweet After Massive Public Backlash https://t.co/gmVwPg4Oek

— Mark Krikorian (@MarkSKrikorian) June 22, 2020

#EXPOSEANTIFA

BREAKING: @Project_Veritas INFILTRATED ANTIFA

“Practice things like an eye gouge. It takes very little pressure to injure someone’s eyes.”

“It’s not boxing, it’s not kickboxing, it’s like destroying your enemy.” #EXPOSEANTIFApic.twitter.com/tbLeuXucHx

— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) June 4, 2020

Antifa's Handbook

Oh look - a 2018 review of Mark Bray's "Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook." This is "fascism is whatever I don't like" dialed up to 11. https://t.co/BHlg2S0M45

— The American Conservative (@amconmag) June 1, 2020

Principled Cucking

from Iran’s military to college BDS supporters — to College Republicans — the insane terrorist designation fetish continues apace https://t.co/PkYGS5NA9m

— curtmills (@CurtMills) May 31, 2020

Controlled Opposition

Not even alt-lite... an attempt to play the middle (if necessary) in order to cede ground to the cultural Marxists and to work on a consensus that all true dissidents from the state must be repressed.

God Save Poland

The National Question and the War on Poland by James Kirkpatrick







Tommy Robinson (Rebel Media) in Warsaw, Poland

Undercover with Antifa

via Fabius Maximus

Antifa, the Full Film

Antifa Trailer

Antifa

President Trump on Charlottesville

full press conference

Antifa = alt-left
Of course the celebrities are upset.

Virtue of the West, Episode 17

Les Brigandes - Antifa

Paul Gottfried on the Constitution

Dead Letter: Our Constitution of No Authority (via CHT)
"In a commentary for Chronicles (unavailable online), Tom Fleming makes an argument about the increasing irrelevance of the Constitution that I find mostly irrefutable."

His differences with Dr. Fleming?

What I can find to counter Tom Fleming’s argument is rather limited and would consist of the following: Although we’re holding an exceedingly poor hand and the momentum is mostly on the other side, we should use those resources that are available to us to keep our enemies from gaining more ground. Some arguments will be more helpful than other ones; and which ones will work will depend on the circumstances. For example, the appeal to nullification that Tom Woods makes in his most recent book is not likely to get us very far, given our two-party monopoly of the political conversation and given the erosion of any understanding of states as living communities.

The kind of state consciousness that existed when Jefferson and Madison raised the idea of nullification two hundred and fifteen years ago is a thing of the past. It does not relate to our less cohesive, perpetually mobile, and by now multiculturalized society. Such appeals will work even less once the GOP crawls back into power and predictably starts acting like the Democrats. Once that happens, Tom’s case will offend the Reps even more than the Dems.

But when telling arguments, including those in support of Nullification, can be marshaled to advance our interest in the short or middle term, we should never hold back. We should be every bit as opportunistic as we can in pursuing our goals. And we should stress the notion of legality in a society that continues to pay homage to that principle, however inconsistently. Calling attention to laws and precedents protecting our property and freedom from government attempts to de- and recode us behaviorally may be our best weapon against a derailed political order. In any case, doing something is better than simply giving up.

Another thought is that global democratic empires like the U.S. and the EU are beginning to suffer from the effects of overload. At this moment the EU’s human rights czars are trying to get Catholic countries, like Italy, to remove religious symbols, and in particular crucifixes, from public buildings. For years the EU has imposed PC guidelines on how its members should deal with invasions of Third World immigrants, gay and feminist lifestyles, and historical narratives that do not fit the imposed antifascist standards.

Similar disputes about control being placed on local and regional authorities have erupted in the U.S.; and we may hope that such dissension will continue to surface and grow even more severe. In these situations claims for more decentralized authority are likely to become more common; and even if these claims won’t bring about total system changes, they can assist us, for a time, in limiting bureaucratic and judicial overreach from the top.

Having made these defenses I should admit that I share Tom Fleming’s general pessimism about making the U.S. Constitution work again, as it once understood as mandating distributed authorities. Whether a constitution is written, as in the American case, or viewed as a series of unwritten precedents, as in the British case, there is no way to prevent its straying once the society that was willing to live by its restraints has vanished.