EB:
Happiness & sustainability - Aug 4 by Staff At EB, and in many of the articles they post, there is a recognition of happiness as the goal of living--
eudaimonia may be making a return in some circles, but how is it faring in academic philosophy?
One of the articles included in this post is the following:
Do environmentalists and governments hold back sustainable lifestyles
Tom Levitt and Kara Moses, The Ecologist
Misguided images of sacrifice may be putting people off living more sustainable lifestyles. But reversing that may require policymakers to start encouraging wider metrics of success and happiness Who wants a sustainable lifestyle? Well actually quite a lot of people, apparently. Far from being a niche concept, a major new study on sustainability from the UNEP says the idea is ‘misunderstood as a rich nation choice’.
While the desire to enjoy western living standards is strong, the study picks out a range of sustainable living ideas being developed across the world. It says one of the biggest barriers to more people achieving them may be how we celebrate and communicate these ideas.
Most definitions of sustainable lifestyles talk about three key areas; minimal environmental impact, not undermining the carrying capacity of resources (i.e. using only those that are renewable or replaceable over time) and helping people interact with the communities and places in which they live.
But, as the UNEP study points out, 'people will only change their lifestyles in exchange for a better one', so perhaps a fourth point could be just as important: making them desirable...
(4 August 2010)
Alas, the
Task Force on Sustainable Lifestyles was set up by the Swedish Ministry of the Environment. While such studies may recognize the impact human beings have on ecological systems and put forward solutions to these problems, it is a mistake that this is the whole of ethical living. Of course, in such studies such environmental concern is usually coupled with a healthy dose of liberalism, in which anything else goes, so long as no one is harmed against their consent.