Showing posts with label journalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label journalism. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 19, 2021

Revolutionaries at Work



Saturday, October 24, 2020

Interview with Bethany McLean

Wednesday, May 27, 2020

The Errors of Liberalism

via Rod Dreher - Amanda Ripley, Complicating the Narratives:

I’m embarrassed to admit this, but I’ve been a journalist for over 20 years, writing books and articles for Time, the Atlantic, the Wall Street Journal and all kinds of places, and I did not know these lessons. After spending more than 50 hours in training for various forms of dispute resolution, I realized that I’ve overestimated my ability to quickly understand what drives people to do what they do. I have overvalued reasoning in myself and others and undervalued pride, fear and the need to belong. I’ve been operating like an economist, in other words — an economist from the 1960s.

For decades, economists assumed that human beings were reasonable actors, operating in a rational world. When people made mistakes in free markets, rational behavior would, it was assumed, generally prevail. Then, in the 1970s, psychologists like Daniel Kahneman began to challenge those assumptions. Their experiments showed that humans are subject to all manner of biases and illusions.
So even though all human beings are rational, it does not mean that they exercise rationality equally or in the same way. And we should not ignore the role that emotion, both in good and bad ways, can affect our judgment and reasoning.

Researchers have a name for the kind of divide America is currently experiencing. They call this an “intractable conflict,” as social psychologist Peter T. Coleman describes in his book The Five Percent, and it’s very similar to the kind of wicked feuds that emerge in about one out of every 20 conflicts worldwide. In this dynamic, people’s encounters with the other tribe (political, religious, ethnic, racial or otherwise) become more and more charged. And the brain behaves differently in charged interactions. It’s impossible to feel curious, for example, while also feeling threatened.

In this hypervigilant state, we feel an involuntary need to defend our side and attack the other. That anxiety renders us immune to new information. In other words: no amount of investigative reporting or leaked documents will change our mind, no matter what.

Intractable conflicts feed upon themselves. The more we try to stop the conflict, the worse it gets. These feuds “seem to have a power of their own that is inexplicable and total, driving people and groups to act in ways that go against their best interests and sow the seeds of their ruin,” Coleman writes. “We often think we understand these conflicts and can choose how to react to them, that we have options. We are usually mistaken, however.”

Once we get drawn in, the conflict takes control. Complexity collapses, and the us-versus-them narrative sucks the oxygen from the room. “Over time, people grow increasingly certain of the obvious rightness of their views and increasingly baffled by what seems like unreasonable, malicious, extreme or crazy beliefs and actions of others,” according to training literature from Resetting the Table, an organization that helps people talk across profound differences in the Middle East and the U.S.
Can journalism be salvaged with the lessons/strategies that Ripley puts forward? Not the MSM, I don't think, and it shouldn't. The press is an instrument for shaping opinion, not just reporting fact, and an instrument that the few or the elites would rather have under their control, and if they mean to produce conflict, they will produce conflict. Would there still be promotion of conflict in a small-scale political community? First, information would not be through someone making a living reporting the news, though it may be second-hand or third-hand or fourth-hand rather than first-hand. But in the case of serious disputes, this would not be addressed by "public opinion" or the swaying of "public opinion" to one side or the other, but by the community, either through a designated authority or some other recognized intermediary. The modern press is parasitical on oversized population centers and rarely fulfill the task that they claim to be serving.

Sunday, December 30, 2018

Monday, March 06, 2017

More Incest Between the Fourth and Fifth Estates

Steven Spielberg, Tom Hanks & Meryl Streep Team for Pentagon Papers Drama 'The Post'

I regard "Hollywood," reffering to not the geographic location but the mass entertainment corporations collectively, as the "traditional" Fifth Estate, given their power over the American imagination. (Apparently there has been a push to name bloggers and such as the Fifth Estate, but I regard those currently disseminating alternative points of view to be part of the people, and not of the elites.) Given who owns what, are the Fourth and Fifth Estates really that distinct now?

Friday, November 11, 2016

Would he ever consider doing such things without photographers and publicity?

No, these are deliberate teaching moments, showing that the pope takes a maximalist conception of "universal teacher" seriously, and is willing to use the mass media for this end, enhancing the papal personality cult in the process.



Edit.


Priests who were laicized...

Saturday, June 18, 2016

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Saturday, March 12, 2016

A Patriarchate in Need of Correction

A group of panelists from Tuesday's Voices of Faith event in the Vatican came to Vatican Radio to discuss the issues facing women in the Church.

Posted by Vatican Radio - English Section on Saturday, March 12, 2016

Monday, December 21, 2015

No Grasp of Sound Moral Theology

In political questions, just watered down Catholici social teaching and a reliance upon a liberal (or aggregate) conception of the common good. The statism of some of those offering their opinions is also revealing. Of course the NCReg relies upon standard "journalism" writing, giving both "sides" of the issue, but Catholic newspapers should either avoid doing popular articles on disputed questions in moral theology or do it correctly with an informed presentation. Apparently a Catholic newspaper cannot replace sound catechesis.

Does Catholic Faith Dictate a Position on Gun Control? by Brian Fraga

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

How does Twitter make money again?

Twitter introduced a set of special emoji on Tuesday for Pope Francis' historic visit to the U.S. The special characters...

Posted by Vatican Radio - English Section on Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Vatican journalism:

George Seyfried, a student at a Jesuit high school in Connecticut in the U.S., said one of the reasons why he likes Pope...

Posted by Vatican Radio - English Section on Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Friday, August 08, 2014

Kill the Messenger

Based on the story of Gary Webb.


Focus Films

What would Mike Ruppert make of the movie?

Sunday, March 28, 2010

The collapse of journalism / The journalism of collapse
Robert Jensen, School of Journalism, University of Texas
The first step in crafting a new narrative for journalists is to reject technological fundamentalism and deal with a harsh reality: In the future we will have to make due with far less energy, which means less high-technology and a need for more creative ways of coping. Journalists have to tell stories about what that kind of creativity looks like. They have to reject the gee-whizzery of much of the contemporary science and technology reporting and emphasize the activities of those with a different worldview.

(original)

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Telegraph: Men do not grow grumpy with age, research finds (via FTW)

Does grumpiness have anything to do with the actual results of the study?

Despite the curmudgeonly stereotype cultivated by Victor Meldrew in the BBC sitcom One Foot in the Grave, scientists found that older people view the world through rose-tinted spectacles, remembering the good times rather than the bad.

Researchers asked groups of 19 to 31-year-olds and 61 to 80-year-olds to view a series of photographs while analysing their brains’ activity.

and

They found that in older people, there were stronger connections between regions of the brain that process emotions and those known to be important for forming memories. The trend was particularly strong for processing positive information.


and

The results suggest that older people are much more likely to remember happy moments than their younger counterparts, the journal Cortex reports.


The reasoning is rather weak.

Do men get cranky as they get older because of their inborn temperament? Or because of their acquired character? Cicero gives one answer. Having had more experience than young people, old men are better acquainted with disappointment and failure, especially the flaws of others. Do people become more stubborn and set in their ways, especially how they react to life?

De Senectute